Letter to the Editor,
In view of the deleterious results famous by Gotts et al., one wonders why Public Well being England continues to advertise the utilization of e-cigarettes to assist people who smoke of cigarettes give up.
We within the healthcare occupation are certain by the moral precept of Do No Hurt. Given the proof introduced on this evaluate, utilizing e-cigarettes to give up smoking introduces new unintended unfavourable well being penalties, not solely these talked about within the article, however presumably a brand new type of dependancy which there isn’t any recognized evidence-based means for e-cigarette cessation.
There are presently numerous technique of serving to cigarette people who smoke give up with out the added dangers talked about within the article. The utilization of nicotine alternative medicines or different non-nicotine medicines with efficient counselling can vastly enhance success in cessation of cigarette smoking with out people who smoke including to the checklist critical antagonistic dangers of ailments talked about in your article, together with a brand new dependancy.
Public Well being England ought to reverse its determination due to the hurt we now know and possibly proceed to find as we navigate by means of this new business induced world-wide epidemic.
Not solely will we expertise well being associated unfavourable penalties because of the introduction of this novel know-how, however we could have inadvertently launched a brand new dependancy –vaping – which presently there isn’t any recognized evidence-based cessation strategies to assist those that are contemplating stopping vaping. It might prove that vaping is far more durable to cease, which, I imagine, was not correctly thought-about by those that advocate e-cigarettes as technique of cigarette hurt discount intervention.